This blog does not represent any policy or opinion held by the New School for Social Research. I do not represent NSSR in any capacity, official or otherwise. All opinions represented here are my own.
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
Blog
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
(slightly) closer to perfection
Louis Colombo
Bethune-Cookman University
Lester Embree (PhD 1972)
Florida Atlantic University
Joshua Hayes
Santa Clara and Loyola Marymount
Brendan Hogan
NYU
Jennifer Scuro
University of Colorado, Colorado Springs
Miguel Vatter
Instituto de Humanidades de la Universidad Diego Portales
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
eidos and eidelon
Monday, February 22, 2010
Laclau's aside
You seem to remember a time when Brooklyn had a culture that revolved around something other than strollers, foodblogs, and incipient fascism. If asked, you say you prefer the earlier work of Ana Peru (Peru Ana). Perhaps you even think that Philosophy is something more than intellectual therapy, for example, the study of what is and what constitutes the good life. But you’re starting to feel conservative and jaded, stuck in the rut of reading and writing, your only fuel the written records of the Mighty Dead.
Then you hear a talk about something familiar but, strangely, it is new. I had this experience Thursday night when Ernesto Laclau and Katherine Mouffe spoke at NYU. Exiled to a Comp Lit conference from their native realm of truth, Laclau spoke on political antagonism and Mouffe on “the subject as a trace of an other that exceeds representation.” It would be too much to reconstruct or even summarize what was said. What struck me was a comment Laclau made that was really not much more than an aside.
Laclau said that, against Kant, Hegel returned to a negative, Platonic conception of matter. The point, which is in some sense completely obvious, had never struck me before. But if one accepts the kind of account attributed to Plato by Aristotle (e.g. ‘matter as privation’ at Metaphysics A.6) or looks closely at the Hericlitean themes in some of the dialogues (e.g. the divided line in the Republic or Diotima’s speech in the Symposium), then Laclau’s attribution makes a great deal of sense. Was this recovery the same crucial move that propelled Hegel beyond Kantianism?
Sunday, February 21, 2010
most intelligent
I have in mind one Ronald K. Hoeflin, the founder of several high-IQ societies with names like 'The One-in-a-Thousand Society' and 'The Prometheus Society'. In running these organizations, Hoeflin has edited various journals for the high-IQ community (yes, apparently there is such a thing). He also created the Mega and Titan intelligence tests, for which he developed special methods to measure super-high IQs (usually tests become unreliable above a certain high mark). In a Village Voice article, Rachel Aviv reports that his IQ is around 190. So one might say that Hoeflin is the "most intelligent" graduate of the department. That article also reports that Hoeflin has quite a sense of humor – and a solid command of Freud.
At the New School, Hoeflin studied with J. N. Mohanty, Anthony Quinton, Reuben Abel, and Albert Hofstadter – some of whom are interesting enough characters as to deserve their own (potential and future) blog entries. He completed his M.A. in 1979 and Ph.D. 1987. According to Wikipedia, Hoeflin won the American Philosophical Association's Rockefeller Prize in 1988 for his article, "Theories of Truth: A Comprehensive Synthesis”, which argues for “the interrelated nature of seven leading theories of truth.”
Wikipedia also tells us that growing up in St Louis, Hoeflin memorized pi to 200 places. What is a man of such varied talents doing today? Rumor has it that he is completing the last part of a three-volume work: "The Encyclopedia of Categories: A Theory of Categories and Unifying Paradigm for Philosophy" and living in a rent-controlled studio in Hell’s Kitchen. Could this man be our very own Chas Peirce? I haven’t gotten my hands on the book yet, but it sounds promising…
Thursday, January 21, 2010
New School Philosophers
The New School does not, to my knowledge, publish any data of this sort. A good reason might be that the school does not want to play into the hands of the Leiter-Reportesque “professionalization” of the discipline. After all, one would like to believe that an education in the immortal things is not merely a commercial endeavor.
On the other hand, a more cynical explanation of the same phenomenon would be that the New School simply does not maintain such data. This seems likely as the administrative organization of the school is often conducted in the most ad hoc and cursory manner.
I have included only the information from the websites of the relevant academic institutions. For the same reason, the information is often incomplete. If I have omitted anyone or any important information, please let me know at humpj990@newschool.edu and I will make the relevant changes. I can also remove an institution, name, AOS, or year by request.
Bard College:
Adam Rosen-Carole
The nature and status of psychoanalytic knowledge, philosophy and the claims of suffering (pathos, pathology), political philosophy after Adorno and Derrida
Bishop’s University
Don Dombowsky
Boston University
Henry E. Allison
Aaron Garrett
Clemson
Bill Maker
19th and 20th century Continental Philosophy, especially Kant, Hegel, Marx, and Nietzsche
Concordia
Pablo Gilabert
Gordon College
Lauren S. Barthold
Hobart and William Smith College
John Krummel (Ph.D.1999)
Comparative theology, Phenomenology, Heidegger, Kant, Nishida, Nietzsche, Mishima, Dostoevsky, Buddhist philosophy, Kyoto school philosophy, Existentialism, Post-modern thought, History of philosophy, Philosophy of religion, Death & Dying, Nihilism, Critique of modernity
Marquette University
James P. Flaherty
Classical American pragmatism and contemporary neo-pragmatism
Miami University
William McKenna
Phenomenology, Epistemology, History of Philosophy
Muhlenburg College
Marcia Morgan
Purchase College
Jared Russell
Philosophy, psychology, psychoanalytic studies
Penn State
Christopher Long (Ph.D. 1998)
Ancient Philosophy, Aristotle, Continental Philosophy, Critical Theory
Roanoke College
Monica Vilhauer
Ethics, social-political philosophy, feminist philosophy, ancient philosophy, and 19th and 20th Century European philosophy
Rochester Institute of Technology
Katie Terezakis (Ph.D. 2004)
Aesthetics, German Idealism, Political Philosophy and the history of philosophy
Sarah Lawrence
Roy Brand
Continental philosophy, modern and contemporary aesthetics, philosophy of film and new media, and trauma and popular culture
Seton Hall University
Judith Stark
Augustine of Hippo, feminist theories, and environmental issues
Siena College
John Blanchard (Ph.D. 2001)
Plato, Aristotle, pre-Socratic philosophy, metaphysics, Nietzsche, Heidegger, food and politics
Pablo Muchnik (Ph.D. 2002)
Kant, modern philosophy, and political philosophy
St. Johns Annapolis
William Jon Lenkowski
Matthew S. Linck
Stewart Umphrey
Michael Weinman
John F. White
St. Johns College Santa Fe
Anthony James Carey
Russell Winslow
SUNY Stony Brook
Megan Craig
Eduardo Mendieta
University of Alaska Anchorage
James Liszka
University of Louisville
Osborne P. Wiggins
Philosophy & Psychiatry, Phenomenology
University of Massachusetts Boston
Steven Levine
University of Northern Iowa
William W. Clohesy
Moral and political philosophy, German philosophy, American pragmatism, existential phenomenology
University of Windsor
Radu Neculau.
Social and Political Philosophy and in 19th and 20th Century European Philosophy
University of Wisconsin Green Bay:
Gilbert Null (Emeritus)
University of Wisconsin Oshkosh
Aaron Vlasak
History of Ancient Philosophy
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
The Old New School
Indeed, the dismissal of the philosophical canon from American philosphy departments McCumber writes, "provided another, more timely motive for anguish among the people who met in January 1978 in the Manhattan apartment of Charles Sherover, a professor at Hunter College. An accrediting committee of the state of New York - its personnel supplied by the APA - had just visited the philosophy department at the New School for Social Research. The committee had recommended that the program be disaccredited, on the grounds that it was so far removed from he mainstream of American philosophy as to be overspecialized and sectarian." (Time in the Ditch 51)